barkhuizen v napier造句

• Barkhuizen v Napier dealt with a contractual time-bar clause requiring action to be instituted against an insurer within ninety days of the rejection of an insurance claim.
• In its only other encounter with direct horizontality, in Barkhuizen v Napier, the Constitutional Court declined to apply the Bill of Rights directly to a challenge to a time-limitation clause in an insurance contract.
• In " Barkhuizen v Napier ", a short-term insurance policy contained a time-bar clause to the effect that the insurer would not be liable under a claim unless summons was served within ninety days of repudiation of the claim.